top of page

Implant-Supported over dentures

Implant Placement

Chief Complaint

Patient requested improved retention and stability of the upper denture.

Clinical Findings

  • Existing upper acrylic denture with reduced retention.

  • Adequate bone present at proposed implant sites, though thin bone noted at #11 and #13.

  • Pre-operative CBCT reviewed: No sinus perforation risk at #13 and #24 confirmed via sinus test.

Treatment Plan

  • Placement of five dental implants at #13, #11, #22, #23, and #24 to support and retain the upper acrylic denture.

  • Use surgical stent for guided osteotomy with freehand modification where indicated.

  • Modify upper denture with female housings for implant retention.

  • Provide oral hygiene and denture care instructions.

Pre-operative Assessment

  • Medical history reviewed and non-contraindicated.

  • Risks, benefits, complications, and alternative treatment options discussed.

  • Surgical stent fit tested — stable and well-adapted.

  • Informed consent obtained.

Anesthesia

Local anesthesia infiltration administered to upper arch at implant sites (#13, #11, #22, #23, #24).

Surgical Procedure

  • Patient draped and disinfected.

  • Osteotomy performed using surgical guide.

  • Sinus test performed for #13 and #24: negative for perforation.

  • Intra-operative CBCT taken to confirm positioning.

  • At #11, due to deviation from thin bone, flap raised and implant placed freehand.

  • 4/0 Vicryl sutures placed at #11.

  • Implant at #23 also placed freehand after initial implant placements.

  • Five Dentium Slimline implants (3.0mm × 10.0mm) placed at sites #13, #11, #22, #23, #24.

  • Upper denture modified to receive BPF3 female housings using rubber dam isolation.

  • Denture relined and polished.

  • Patient instructed on denture insertion, removal, and hygiene.

Post-operative Assessment

  • Hemostasis achieved and patient stable.

  • Post-op CBCT confirms implant positions.

  • #13 implant noted close to sinus but no perforation observed intra-operatively.

  • Slightly reduced prognosis for #11 and #13 implants due to thin bone; patient informed and acknowledged.

  • Patient satisfied with esthetics and occlusion.

bottom of page